On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 06:58:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was a temporary workaround for #413964, which at the time was > supposed to not last very long, and had to change because of #416425. > > I guess changing the dependency to a >= one should be enough to be safe > in the future, but I'll do some testing with pkgconfig.
I implemented the proper fix, that should not break for future security updates, and am currently uploading the corrected package to security-master. I also added fixes that were already in -0etch2 but that were dropped because not that important (and because it failed to build due to the presence of a source tarball in the changes file I uploaded). Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
