On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > Source: qca > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > Yes please. But also notice to not replace current qca in unstable with > > qca2. > > I don't know yet what's the best solution. put qca2 as qca in experimental > > - > > or package it as qca2 in unstable. > > This seems to be an interesting question: It was also raised at ubuntu, > see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qca/+bug/128505 > > It may be useful for mailody (and perhaps other software outside the > repository) to keep qca1 around in parallel to qca2. > > While libqca1c2 and libqca2 can be installed at the same time, they can > not both be in the same release if they come from different versions of > the same source package. > > Therefore I consider moving version 2 of qca to a different source > package named qca2. Opinions? >
I think this was the plan from the beginning, but since you already had a copy of qca2 beta in experimental, it sounded like a good plan update that copy to avoid NEW. Now we have apps needing qca1 and another apps needing qca2 seems like we have to. Please, go ahead :)) Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
