-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Resending aain, because your broken SPF check rejected the mail and
afair -quiet doesn't go to the maintainer.
- ----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:08:24 +0000
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mx1.tigertech.net [64.62.209.31]: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: SPF check fail: Please see
http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=rene.engelhard%40gmx.de&ip=70.103.162.29&receiver=tigertech.net
- ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1IHc63-0002b6-H6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:08:23 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Aug 2007 09:07:52 -0000
Received: from dslb-088-067-026-093.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO frodo)
[88.67.26.93]
by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 05 Aug 2007 11:07:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1545045
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19tS5sKZ8Bt94/5pMYlhV8TL5//62wgcxSRm2F6iZ
NWmCcqftH+Lr+8
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 20A619F3F1; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:07:49 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#409722: ICU 3.8 coming out soon
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> It might be worth someone who can reproduce the problems taking a look
> at 3.8 and seeing whether or not the patches have been included. In
> any case, I will plan on closing this bug when I upload 3.8 to
> unstable, and will request a new bug report if the problems are still
> present. Thanks.
Sorry, but this is nonsense.
I didn't get your mail asking for more info in the first place somehow,
so I couldn't have answered. You at least could have pinged me again.
Anyway, note that I referred to the patches already in OOos tree (see my
link), not nessessarily those at Fedoras CVS (although they are probably
also nice to have).
The stuff is in OOos patched icu because it broke come cases, that's why
the Sun people added those patches. Not adding tgem because you just
don't want it is complete nonsene.
And for checking whether they apply with icu 3.8, that's *your* job, you
are the icu maintainer, and you plan to upgrade ICU, not me.
If you can't test it, get some indic person test the package? I can't
test it either but I am 100% sure the patches aren't in OOos icu for no
resaon.
I'll reopen this bug evetytime you decide to close it.
Regards,
Rene
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGtZNk+FmQsCSK63MRAl8XAJ9zPJy+eY86qrIpmkEsInOVJIR0mwCeOWph
ulgg0YUvhcnSEjrSUoYe7kg=
=3XJf
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- ----- End forwarded message -----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGtZoy+FmQsCSK63MRAn27AJ4okKjo0xO4+RwiIx5WiuDiH7mz3ACcDpzN
jTCwH1+QCv0A/f/AZM5rrZY=
=SvDb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
