Hi, I've read the arguments for/against this warning, and I'm not quite convinced.
For example, SquirrelMail webmail is also GPL. There could be a bug that would cause a "very important business mail" to be deleted. Or a security issue that allows to read private mail or to remotely send email on behalf of the user. Luckily that's currently theoretical, but damage can indeed be inflicted on the user when using this GPL'ed software due to bugs in the software. I dare to assert that exposing someone's private mail can do more damage than destroying some piece of hardware. I think I can make similar cases for many other pieces of GPL'ed software. The risk of damage is not specific to hardware-interacting tools like xsane. It may be useful to note that clickthrough licences are not legally binding at least here in The Netherlands. So a program used here is not more protected than any other GPL'ed software. Please reconsider this mandatory clickthrough licence. Thanks, Thijs
