On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:50:58AM +0200, Michael Below said: > Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said: > >> If you are worried about privacy issues, feel free to send it to me > >> outside of the BTS, and I will send the relevant parts upstream, and > >> take care to omit anything you feel is sensitive. > > > > Is there any way this can be done, so as to finally fix this bug? Or > > can you make sure it is still an issue with 0.84rc1? Or some > > combination :) > > Oops, sorry. I got as far as resolving those privacy issues, but > forgot to tell you. > > Here's an error log for one problematic mail. It shouldn't contain > anything sensitive. I did it on february 16th, of course I can repeat > it with a more current clamscan if necessary.
Would it be possible to get a copy of the doc file in the email? That would be a great help. I can see from the debug output that that is the problem, but it's hard to go any further. Thanks again, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | BOFH excuse #40: not enough memory, go | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | get system upgrade | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpY082JGEIYy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
