On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:04:38 Michael Meskes wrote: > I just uploaded a new version to incoming that also contains changes to > the code fragment patched in this bug report. Albeit this patch is > different than the one listed here. Could you please try whether the > problem still exists with -8? > > Thanks. > > Michael
In my opinion the problem still persists. All you did is change it from awaking a lot to awaking a little less (2x a second). My preferred solution would only wake up when needed. Are you absolutely positive that blocking infinite makes the the application not stop on SIGTERM? I really doubt it. Greetings, Joost -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
