tags 412824 unreproducible moreinfo
tags 412824 - patch
thanks

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:18:13PM +0200, Khalid Shukri wrote:
> It turned out that the situation is a bit more complex:

Basicly you are saying you have two systems:

- an amd64 in which md5sums do NOT match
- a i386 system in which md5sums do match

since INITBASEDIR was not properly defined in bastille (see #436173) the fact
that the amd64 had a correct INITBASEDIR and a mismatched md5sum makes me
think you (or somebody else) locally edited that file to manually fix the
bug.

> On amd64 architecture:
> /sbin/bastille-firewall-reset
> contains the line INITBASEDIR=/etc/init.d (correct)
> has the md5sum 2d21398465cd7d19339595c7e5d3e971
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/bastille.md5sums contains the corresponding value 
>       b8280801f22ab957eea46a3766099717 (wrong)

Aren't you sure you didn't locally modify that file? the INITBASEDIR in
bastille was (wrongly) defined until I fixed #436713 which was done a few 
days back.

> On i386:
> /sbin/bastille-firewall-reset
> contains the line INITBASEDIR=/etc/rc.d/init.d (wrong)

This was bug #436713 and has been now fixed.

> has the md5sum b8280801f22ab957eea46a3766099717
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/bastille.md5sums contains the corresponding value 
>       b8280801f22ab957eea46a3766099717 (correct for the buggy file)

The file is the one distributed by the package. The bug was fixed in #436713.

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to