Package: apt Version: 0.7.6 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I have unstable and experimental enabled in sources.list, and on /etc/apt/apt.conf I have the line APT::Default-Release "unstable"; As you see bellow, experimental is given a priority of 1, and I think it is against common sense. If I *consciously* install a package from experimental, I would like to *be aware of, and upgrade to, all the updates that come into experimental* before the package comes into unstable. When the package comes into unstable, apt will forget about the experimental version of the package. By the way, the experimental release of debian-multimedia.org is given a priority of 500 and I find it OK. What I do not understand is the priority 1 for the experimental release of the official Debian packages. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 Debian Release: lenny/sid 990 unstable www.debian-multimedia.org 990 unstable ftp.uk.debian.org 500 stable dl.google.com 500 experimental www.debian-multimedia.org 1 experimental ftp.uk.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==============================================-+-==================== libc6 (>= 2.6-1) | 2.6.1-1 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.2-20070516) | 1:4.2.1-3 libstdc++6 (>= 4.2-20070516) | 4.2.1-3 debian-archive-keyring | 2007.07.31