LaMont Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:39:06PM +0300, Anton Chernev wrote:
>> $ strings -a /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd | grep "sasl:/usr/lib/sasl2"
>> /etc/postfix/sasl:/usr/lib/sasl2
> Does that mean it looks for the file in both places?
That is the path that postfix provides to sasl. It also tells me
that you're running a version of postfix that didn't allow an
alternate config directory for sasl (hardcoded /etc/postfix). It's
also possible that said version has the defect that it only
half-dealt with the path split that sasl did a bit ago... does
debian/patches/10tls.dpatch add a routine called xsasl_getconfpath?
What version of postfix are we talking about here?
lamont
No such routine is mentioned in any of the files in the debian/patches
directory (the file you mentioned is 50tls.dpatch, btw).
I thought the first post mentions the version in the pseudo-header,
namely 2.3.8-2.
I have obtained these sources by doing an "apt-get source postfix" after
an apt database update on Etch. How could this result in getting
outdated sources? In aptitude it seems this is the latest version of the
package.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
