On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 06:57:00PM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:11:55PM +0200, Thomas Strosslin wrote: > > >>> Mike, do you use a custom script for iceape? or is mozilla.in used > > > > >> Same custom script as iceweasel. MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME has not been required > > >> for a while. It would actually be better if icedove didn't set it. > > > > >Well, afaik it is required ... at least I had reports that python > > >embedders crash without that env. > > > > maybe. It works for me without it though, but setting it to a bad value > > is not good. The iceape binary does not ignore MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME in case > > it is set. If it is not clear how the binaries make use of the env, why > > not stick to the upstream scripts as closely as possible _for all_ ice*? > > seamonkey, firefox and thunderbird all use the same run-mozilla.sh. > > IMHO, the debian release should only differ where this is needed for > > debian, and this need should be reevaluated anew for each upstream release. > > > > > IIRC, the *debian* script was introduced because upstream script was > inheritantly broken at some point .... however i don't think this is > the case anymore ... except for the multi-level-link case I previously > mentioned. Mike, would you reconsider to give upstream scripts a try > again?
I need to give it a look. Probably this week-end. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]