* Gilles Sadowski: > Here are some (approximate) numbers (time in minutes) to give an idea > of the problem: > > QL | QH > --------+------- > 1.6 -Xint 60 | 120 > 1.6 JIT 15 | 10 <---- Something wrong here, I think. > 1.5 JIT 6 | 12
Okay, this seems to be a performance regression in the 1.6 JVM (arguably a bug). Are the GC settings the same? Is your application allocation-intense? >> It's somewhat expected that relative performance changes. > > How could that be expected??? Few improvements to the JIT compiler benefit all programs across the board. A particular optimization might kick in in QL, but not in QH, or vice versa. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
