On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:36:06PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Thursday 23 August 2007 17:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > * Upload to experimental since upgrade from previous versions is not > > handled > > Am I correct to assume that the next Debian revision will feature a postinst > script that (reliably) handles upgrades from pre-2.0? (Because otherwise I'd > expect WebSVN 2.0 to be packaged as, say, websvn2.) >
I don't think this would be a good idea: websvn 1.x will no more be maintained, and this will cause bugs / security problems (see #439337). Since I really don't want to maintain the code itself, it is clearly a better solution to go for websvn 2 migration. Configuration files are not very different, however if they had been really customized I think there will be no proper solution. So, I really see that as a not-so-bad (force migration) vs worse (keep unmaintainable code) solution. Though, opinion / ideas on this problems are welcome. Regards, Pierre
