On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 21:02 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:19:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, at some point one of the reversions has ended up > > immediately preceeded by a return() and therefore been skipped. The > > attached trivial patch should fix that. Could you please apply it and > > see if that resolves the issue for you? > > This seems to fix it for me.
Thanks for the quick reply. I've commited the fix to SVN. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
