Quoting Alexander Gattin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > IMHO it should be researched where/how is userdel > used/scripted.
As the bug report mentions, most of the time in deluser. In Debian, at least. Marc, CC'ing you : what is your opinion about the "right" behaviour from userdel (from deluser point of view) when a user group has an extra member and not the user him/herself only? -userdel should fail and not remove the user groups -userdel should remove the user group but not fail, just issue a warning
