On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Luca Bigliardi wrote:
I'm sorry, I haven't read README.Debian, it's my fault.
No problem. I admit that I would probably also ignore the README.Debian
of WOrdNet when searching information about grind. If you have any idea
where this could be documented more sanely I'm open for suggestions.
I was suggesting a different package for grind because I was thinking to
upstream split (and I haven't noticed your merge).
In fact the real need is "grind" and not "grind's package".
Well, from historical reasons of the WordNet packaging I do not really
like the split upstream is doing. IMHO everything belongs into one
single tarball - especially the WordNet source database that is compipled
using grind. So if there should something be split than it is the
grind executable alone and the database definitely belongs to the
WordNet source package. That's why I merged the stuff.
I think you should include it not only in source package but also in some
binary package a normal user can install.
Well, so your suggestion would be: Add a binary package grind out of
the current Debian source tarball which contains /usr/bin/grind and
/usr/share/man/man1/grind.1 ? I think this can be easily done and
would not really do any harm. My concern was just about the huge
database source. If you acknowledge that this would fully close the
issue of the bug I'll go for it in the next couple of days.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
