On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:21 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > but you're the package maintainer, i'm just a stupid user, who is > trying > > to propose some usability improvements ... > > I need to pick a balance here. Is forcing every user to install the > extra package before use (and removing the plugins for default > install) the right thing to do, for who? If it's going to be optional > and no one is going to install it, why not remove it? Why is it going > to stay, if it's going to stay, why is it optional?
afaict, the plugins from the ladspa-sdk are not really intended to be used, but should just demonstrate the ladspa api ... otherwise, why would richard furse add them to his cmt plugin library? the plugins, that are installed to /usr/lib/ladspa are supposed to be used ... best, tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org Relying on the government to protect your privacy is like asking a peeping tom to install your window blinds. John Perry Barlow
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
