On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> same here, do we really need a package for a wrapper around xsltproc, > >> where the GPL header is larger than the script itself? > > > > Why not to put that script inside the xsltproc package instead of > > creating a new one? > > sounds like an good idea.
And with my libxslt maintainer hat on, I must say I'm not against it. So Loic, if you're okay with the idea, please reassign the bug as a wishlist against xsltproc. It would also be helpful if you'd attach the script and the xslt to the bug. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
