El Wednesday 12 September 2007 17:29:11 Pierre Habouzit va escriure: > It is named that way because it worked that way before. Though, with > the growing number of packages, the user is often flooeded with many > many changelogs entries he does not care about, so the default setting > is more sensible, as NEWS.Debian are must-reads, whereas the changelogs > are informational.
OK, makes sense. > As there is debconf to help changing the setup and that the debconf > question is properly worded, the few people wanting to read full > changelogs can change that at apt-listchanges install time. Agreed. However, given that debconf default priority is medium, on most installations the debconf question won't be worded at all, and apt-listchanges will silently ignore the changelogs. What about changing the priority of the question to "medium", then? If we refer to the Configuration Management protocol, this item, as it changes completely the behaviour of apt-listchanges, is not a "very trivial item" but rather a "normal item that has a reasonable default". Regards. -- David Ammouial http://da.weeno.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
