On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Sorry, this is a 17-year old program. This is not time to change the > > defaults. > > Fair enough. Indeed it is, and googling around shows this to be a common > problem, too. There are other possible solutions to minimize risk: > > * move mailstat out of the default $PATH > * split it out of the procmail package and put a big glowing > warning in the package description
If I move mailstat out of the PATH, people will submit a bug because upgrading to the new package would break existing scripts. The same would happen if I take mailstat out of the procmail package. > Would you not consider one of these, or another solution? No. The "solution" is that people read the fine manual and experiment a little bit before entering "production mode". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
