On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:27:26PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I had so many problems that I stopped using apt-cacher.  Even before
> your message, I was thinking of giving it another try, so your message
> gives me an extra incentive.

Good!
 
> It sounds as if some of the recent and pending fixes are related to some
> of the problems I was having, so I'd prefer to wait until the pending
> fixes have migrated into the package.  Do you expect that to happen
> soon?

If you want to try/test the bleeding edge stuff you can try 1.5.4.1
which  you can get from www.hindley.org.uk/~mark/debian. I am testing it
at the moment. It has most of the fixes for bugs that are tagged
pending. It would be a help to me to know they are *really* fixed!

> 
> It would also be useful for me to get some clarification of issues like
> how to use path_map (bug 364361)

Yes, I know the documentation of this needs rewriting. Basically it maps
paths to hosts. 

So if you have 

path_map debian ftp.uk.debian.org

if you fetch http://localhost:3142/debian/whatever

apt-cacher will download and cache

http://ftp.uk.debian.org/whatever

>and whether apt-cacher will work
> properly with multiple releases (such as testing and unstable--I just
> filed a bug but don't have the number). 

Yes it does. See separate reply.

>Also, does apt-cacher currently
> work with apt-listbugs (364904 seems to say not, but maybe it's only
> saying that the bugs aren't kept by apt-cacher)?

Fix in 1.5.4.1

> 
> Finally, if I set http::Proxy in apt.conf, will my ftp:// entries in
> source.list continue to work (maybe more of an apt question, I know)?

I am not sure about that. This appears to be an alternative way that
some people are using apt-cacher. I don't think it is documented. It may
work. If you feel it is useful then
> 
> Finally, at least two exceptional events occurred while getting my old
> errors: the external mirror I was using went down, and my disk filled
> up.  It may be difficult to reproduce those circumstances.

Again, I hope apt-cacher-cleaner is now more reliable. You can run it
with a -s option to show what it would do (without risking losing the
cache contents).

Mark



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to