Package: flex Version: 2.5.33-12 Severity: minor Hello,
In the generated lexer, in case a C99 compiler is used, flex defines __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and includes <inttypes.h>, causing standard integral limits to be defined. It then proceeds to define its own limits, which clash somewhat with those from the header (UINT8_MAX and UINT16_MAX are not exactly the same, causing sparse to complain). Probably these definitions should be moved before the #endif /* ! C99 */ stance, so as to define them only when !C99. Thanks, JB -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.1 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages flex depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.14 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii m4 1.4.9-2 a macro processing language Versions of packages flex recommends: ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.1.2-3 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-2.95 [c-compiler] 1:2.95.4-27 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.0 [c-compiler] 1:3.0.4-6 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.2 [c-compiler] 1:3.2.3-9 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.6-15 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.3-7 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.1 [c-compiler] 4.1.2-15 The GNU C compiler -- debconf information: flex/upgrade/pre_2.5.5: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
