On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Alain Guibert wrote: > On Saturday, September 22, 2007 at 9:21:17 -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > -1) The README.Debian.hwclock ".gz" extension lacks in comments (the > return of the revenge of the recently closed bug #393539). -rw-r--r-- root/root 2916 2007-09-21 22:12 ./usr/share/doc/util-linux/README.Debian.hwclock
I see no .gz on that file as delivered. There was previously, and now there is not. > -2) If /etc/adjtime is not writable, the --noadjfile option will be > added to hwclock. This --noadjfile will force --hctosys to ignore an > existing /etc/adjtime, it will then be unable to compensate past drift, > and will set a wrong system time (corrected only later at S11). > > The goal here is to use --noadjfile when /etc/adjtime does not exist and > can't be created, not when it is readable. I'd propose to change the > test to [ ! -r /etc/adjtime ]. When I was testing, it was failing attempting to _WRITE_ /etc/adjtime in that invocation. Hence the test for writablility. > -3) If the --hctosys call requires $HWCLOCKPARS (perhaps --directisa), > the --adjust call most probably requires it also. This one actually makese sense to apply. I'll add it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
