El mié, 26-09-2007 a las 18:08 -0400, Pascal Giard escribió: > Hi Javier, > > On 9/26/07, Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I'm curious, given that this package has Evo's version hard-coded in the > > plug-in's path name, shouldn't you use a versioned dependency on Evo? > > Unfortunatly, i don't know any way of doing that. > The path is found using pkg-config in debian/rules. > The dependency is autogenerated by shlibs in debian/control. > > I'd very much like to fix this and welcome any suggestion!
You could handle this the way Pidgin plug-ins such as pidgin-encryption, pidgin-otr and others do. I.e.: Depends: ..., pidgin (>= 2.1), pidgin (<< 3.0) However, you might be better asking debian-devel about this. I ran a couple searches in the list archives but couldn't find any enlightening post. > PS: I uploaded 4.1.dfsg.1-3 built using an i386 chroot. I noticed. Thanks a lot! -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
