Dear Peter, On 03/10/2007, Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It took some time but I finally had a moment to look at the issues. Thanks!
> Faré wrote: > > (1) it uses the c-l-c version of asdf and not the ecl-provided one from > > I almost fixed the 'official' asdf to support all the features the ecl > provided one has. I think having a 'special' asdf for ecl is asking for > compatibility problems. > That's a valid fix indeed. Now introducing maintenance problems instead :-) >> (2) it somehow gets cmp.fas and sysfun.lsp to systematically load verbosely >> in a way that isn't hushed up by flag -q resulting in an unremovable banner > > This after some searching turns out to be caused because > common-lisp-controller.lisp uses the function 'compile-file'. As the clc > enabled ecl includes this it causes these messages: > > > ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl/cmp.fas" > > ;;; Loading #P"/usr/lib/ecl/sysfun.lsp" > > I'm currently investigation how to fix this. > Can't you use a :verbose nil option when loading these files, and/or set *load-verbose* to nil? > > (3) compiling configuration files everytime can be a performance issue, > > in addition to requiring to load the compiler. > > I'm not so certain what configuration files you're referring to here. > I admit I don't remember anymore :-( Maybe I was thinking of sysfun.lsp. Maybe tracing compile-file will tell you. <subliminal>cl-launch</subliminal> [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] To this, I shall add one more example: the victim controls the torturer, becauses if the victim screams very loudly at a particular method of torture, this is the method the torturer will select to use. -- Ayn Rand, expounding behaviorist pseudo-psychology, in "Philosophy: Who Needs It?", "The Stimulus and the Response"
