Am Montag, den 22.10.2007, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Loïc Minier: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Michael Biebl wrote: > > according to lintian, the binary package should follow the soname and be > > libgnomeui-2-0. Another possible name would be libgnomeui2-0, which > > would be more in line with the current practice of naming gnome libs. > > > > But libgnomeui-0 is definitely weird. Would you consider a rename or > > provide reasons why the current naming was chosen? > > I agree it's anormal, I don't think we will rename the package now. On > the next SONAME change -- if that ever happens -- yes.
So probably with Gnome 3.0 in a few years ;) Renaming it now would be insane with all the rdeps, right :)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
