On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 17:32:36 +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > ...Anyway :) did you already tried your solution? I'm sorry, I'm pretty > sceptical because it's battery checking that usually sucks much cpu > with ACPI because of the kernel doing busy wait, but it's a known issue.
I have about 100 processes. With that solution (nanosleep of 0,1 s in any cycle) everything seems to work better... even if sometimes there is a hit of cpufreqd. It's quite hard to track what is consuming more CPU, however in default configuration it's unusable in my laptop, it's too CPU-comsuming... I will try to change default config to check what's really CPU-consuming... Thanks, Leonardo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
