Russ Allbery wrote:
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
I'm not sure why we would do this rather than just package 2.3.39.
Wouldn't the latter be a better idea for unstable? (For the stable
security release, of course, we should just cherry-pick the one fix,
assuming it applies to the stable version, which I haven't checked.)
Also, 2.4 is now officially released, so we should really switch to that
ASAP so that we can get rid of 2.2. I'll send more mail about that later
this week, though, since that's going to be a complex transition.
Upgrading to the upstream 2.3.39 release should be simple.
Upgrade to 2.3.39 is I think the better choice here and after that we
can make the switch to 2.4. And now that 2.4 is officially released I
can add some initially packaging for 2.4 in svn.
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
