On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:18:54AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:27:32PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > > Package: xulrunner > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > It would be beneficial to unify how xulrunner is packaged across linux > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > Since upstream is unlikely to adapt the debian way of shipping > > > > xulrunner for various reasons, we should follow their idea on how to > > > > ship xulrunner. > > > > > > What is their idea on how to ship xulrunner ? > > > > Like the ubuntu package does it ... just a plain runner in > > /usr/lib/xulrunner-VERSION + an sdk which we currently ship in > > /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9a8/ using static glue et al ... you > > probably know the details. > > There is no way we're going to use a static glue for embedding > applications. > And I'm not really convinced by the -VERSION thing. >
Why? works pretty well from what i have seen so far. - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
