On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 19:39 +0100, arno renevier wrote: > Package: boo > Severity: minor > > Hi, > Long description of boo package tells: > > "The boo compiler and the programs it produces are 100% CIL and can be run on > any compliant CLI virtual machine" > > I suppose it's a typo, and CIL should be replaced with CLI. > If it's not a typo, it would be nice to explain what CIL means
Actually its not a typo but it may not be a perfect description.
CIL is "Common intermediate language", its the binary code format
produced when compiling, for example, C# or boo.
A CLI ("common language infrastructure") VM is one that run CIL
programs.
Does that made sense? Do you think I should expand these acronyms in
the description?
>
> arno.
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: lenny/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.22custom
> Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages boo depends on:
> pn libmono-corlib1.0-cil <none> (no description available)
> pn libmono-system1.0-cil <none> (no description available)
> pn libmono1.0-cil <none> (no description available)
> pn libmono2.0-cil <none> (no description available)
> pn mono-runtime <none> (no description available)
>
> boo recommends no packages.
>
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
