block 450447 by 396640 thanks Hi Cyril,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:13:28AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Missing -lz, patch attached. Thanks for your patch. The thing is athcool does not need libz by itself, while libpci does. The pciutils source package used to provide a shared libpci.so that depended on libz, and everything was fine. For some reason I don't know, the pciutil's maintainer decided not to provide this shared library anymore, but only the static one. Since that change, many FTBFS have been filed against packages that use libpci (#403181 was against athcool); all have been reassigned to pciutils-dev, and merged to #396640. If you look at the last message to #396640, it seems that since 2.2.6 (current is 2.2.8), pciutils provides pkg-config support, which helps bring the indirect dependencies in an automatic way. I think I should wait for that version to fix athcool's build issue. > There are some lintian warnings around, too: > (source) W: athcool source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 28 I'll fix it as well when pciutils-dev is sane enough for me to upload a new athcool. > (binary) E: athcool: postrm-contains-additional-updaterc.d-calls > /etc/init.d/athcool > (binary) W: athcool: script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d > /etc/init.d/athcool I don't think these are problems. Cheers, Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
