thanks Le vendredi 23 novembre 2007 à 07:57 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > Thank you for your feedback. It is very motivating to hear from other > testeres of insserv. Oh the project is very motivating, so I really hope we will soon have a good system for fast boot :-) I see a lot of things on debian-init-ng list. insserv is one of them, and I really like update-bootsysem-insserv, it works not too bad
> Actually, it reads: > > In the future, the /etc/rc6.d/SXXxxxx scripts MIGHT be moved to > /etc/rc6.d/K1XXxxxx for clarity. > > This is probably not a usable solution, as most systems using the > sequence number demands that they are two digits. Yes of course you're right > The bug you are describing is real, that the shutdown sequence is > slightly incorrect, but the fix will not work properly with insserv, > as insserv require the sequence number to be only two digits. Ok I see, so why not keep the current scripts ? I mean not rename the S to K ? Doesn't insserv know how to deal with S script in 0 and 6 runlevel ? > The real bug here is that insserv is sometimes confused when using the > *-stop dependency information, and fail to generate a correct shutdown > and halt sequence. This is why enabling dependency based boot is > still an exerimental feature, hidden deep inside the postinst script. > I'm working with upstream to try to figure out why this do not work as > expected. Ok, great to hear that :-) > Admins deciding to enable it after reading this text get to keep all > the pieces if it break. I'm lovering the severity to important > because of this. Ok it's right. I wasn't sure of the severity of the bug. Thank you very much for your work. -- Martin Braure de Calignon
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
