First of all, thank you for aknowledge my bug report. I've checked b.d.o and noticed that the bug report is merged to bug #155835. so I've read the log and it seems that bug #155835 is about c99 and gnu extension conflict.
as I said in the previous message, I just want to use gnu extension version of %as, not c99. and it works if the given buffer is not empty. but dies with empty string, like '""'. so I thought that it is a bug in the gnu extension side. I know you guys understand glibc much better than I do. so this not questioning what you guys are doing, but rather I'd like to have some explanation why #453408 and #155835 are merged, if possible. so if someone like me checked the log will understand why. Thank you for your time. -- yashi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]