On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > again, the current way is: a module source package works with l-m-e, or > it doesn't.
I can live with this if you can point me to some documentation about how l-m-e works. I wasn't able to find it yet. > he did, and saw that it is not a fault in the conglomeration package, > thus he reassigned it. A short note containing your reasoning would have been nice. > would be nice if you can also look into #451116 too. Strange, I never received your reply. Anyway, I assume you call make again, but this package has no central makefile at all. So I probably need to create one. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go VfL Borussia! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
