Martín Ferrari dijo [Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:35:37PM -0300]: > Gunnar, > > Have you had the opportunity to advance on this bug (last mail is from > you saying you were working on it)? > > Maybe some pointer so me or other can finish it?
Hi, Nope... And I left it lingering for far too long :-/ And now, re-reviewing the patch, it does _not_ feel as invasive as to warrant the response I gave... I remember I wanted to restructure the patch along these lines: - It adds to new binaries, one of which might be duplicating functionalities existing in other packages (make-apt-repository), although it is quite concise and well suited for the task at hand. (make-apt-repository could be moved to /usr/share/dh-make-perl if it is to be specific to us, though) - I do know that we need to document make-apt-repository and dh-make-perl-all (unless one or both of them are moved to /usr/share) . - I think dh-make-perl-all should be included as part of the main dh-make-perl, as a command-line option... But I'm not really sure about it. - dh-make-perl-all creates a cache/ directory wherever it is invoked - I understand that caches are to be preserved across invocations, so File::Temp::tempdir() is a no-go... But maybe defaulting to ~/.dh-make-perl/cache would be better. As for the Apt and Pool directories, similar notes. So, in short, that's what IMHO should be done. But, of course, when I passed on maintenance to the pkg-perl group, I'm no longer the package's owner! ;-) -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
pgpFpzDIweFCB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
