tags 449307 + patch thanks On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:07:31PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: ... > > This would be cpufreq specific knowledge that can fit into cpufrequtils, > > other than that I can't really see the point of implementing this > > generic cpu-index thing in cpufreq-info when this information is > > available system-wide and parseable with very little effort. > > It just makes more sense to me to parse the same file/information that > cpufrequtils does, rather than similar information exported in different > format to a different location. > > Forget about the patch.
Actually I have to apologize... I completely forgot about the original bug report about the init.d script not behaving correctly. Your first patch makes perfect sense and I'll be applying it as soon as I can get more time to dedicate to my packages (or if anyone is listening and want to NMU it, please go ahead). sorry again for misinterpreting your messages and thanks for your patience and help... -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
