> I am not asking you to do any work on SCons. I am asking you to provide > me with enough information to allow me to debug the problem. So far I > have done several tests based on the extremely limited information which > you have provided, none of which have shown any problem so I can't > really do anything. If you would provide me with enough information to > allow me to see the problem occurring on my systems I would be able to > investigate the problem and hopefully do something to fix it. > > I really do not understand your reluctance to provide me with this > information.
i was trying to debug nova, not scons ... but here you go: - check out nova from git, go to the threaded_dsp branch - run scons compact_build=True system_boost=True pch=True omit_frame_pointer=True libsamplerate=True debug/py_nova.so -j2 - change the file source/kernel/ugen/dsp_thread.hpp ... add a new line or anything that changes it's md5 sum that should trigger a rebuild of the pch, most object files and debug/py_nova.so ... > > does any other distribution except debian package checkpoint releases? > > afaict, neither ubuntu, gentoo or fedora do so ... > > I don't know; you'd have to look at the other distributions and ask the > people responsible for the SCons packages in them. I do know that > Ubuntu has snapshots too (AFAICT they're going to put one in their next > release as well). http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-util/scons/ http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/devel/scons http://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=scons&submit=Search+...&system=fedora&arch= -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tim.klingt.org There's no such entity as "most people". These are generalities. All generalities are meaningless. You've got to pin it down to a specific person doing a specific thing at a specific time and space. William S. Burroughs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
