On 12/17/07, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Kerrisk, le Mon 17 Dec 2007 16:15:47 +0100, a écrit :
> > On 12/17/07, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michael Kerrisk, le Mon 17 Dec 2007 15:56:00 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > @@ -56,10 +71,6 @@
> > > >      done
> > > >      chown root:tty /dev/vcs*
> > > >  .fi
> > > > -
> > > > -No
> > > > -.BR ioctl (2)
> > > > -requests are supported.
> > > >  .SH FILES
> > > >  /dev/vcs[0\-63]
> > > >  .br
> > >
> > > Mmm, I think this is still true. There is no ioctl defined in
> > > drivers/char/vc_screen. c . But if you dropped it just because it's not
> > > very useful to mention it, then fine.
> >
> > Hmmm -- have I made a mistake then.  I dropped that sentence because I
> > mistakenly thought that the addition of VT_GETHIFONTMASK made the
> > sentnce no longer true.  But of course it is still true because that
> > ioctl() does not apply to /dev/vcs[a]*, right?
>
> Yes.

Okay, thanks. I've restored that sentence.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Want to report a man-pages bug?  Look here:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html


Reply via email to