On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, Hi,
> Le vendredi 14 décembre 2007 à 18:51 +0100, Bas Wijnen a écrit : > > For the usual case, where the library uses the other library internally, > > the relation should be written as "Requires.private:". > > Because all these dependencies are created by the configure script, it > is a lot of work to remove them properly, so don’t expect this to be > done in a snap. Of course not. I just wanted to have it reported, because of all warnings I've seen from the new dpkg-shlibdeps, there were hardly any which didn't come from gtk related stuff. ;-) > I also think we should prepare a package in experimental > and ask for a full archive rebuild with it. Sounds reasonable. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
