Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > The problem is caused in config_alternatives() near line 680. There > simply the link in /etc/alternatives is created, but it is not checked, > if $slavelinks[$slnum] exists. Now there is some code at line 597 for > the "auto" action, that does, what we need in config_alternatives() too. > > The question: Should this code be put into a new function? If we need it > twice, it IMHO makes sense. A patch is attached using this idea.
I think that's reasonable. > @Manuel: Please test the attached patch too, if you want and/or suggest > improvements. It works for me. It works for me too. Thanks a lot for your patch! Best regards Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
