On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:56:54PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > dpkg-shlibdeps became stricter, causing wine to FTBFS on amd64:
> >
> > [...]
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for
> > /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so).
> > dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512
> > make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
> > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error
> > exit status 2
>
> Yes this is odd. What are we supposed to do to fix it, put the libs
> directly to /lib32 and /usr/lib32 instead of /emul?
>
> Why does dpkg-shlibdeps not honour symlinks anymore in the first place?
I think it's not about symlinks. From dpkg-shlibdeps:
if ($libobj->is_public_library() and not
add_shlibs_dep($soname, $pkg)) {
[abort message here]
so what we're missing is an shlibs file then?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
