severity 435535 important thanks Bastian ... this is _not_ serious ... please don't bump severity again. (read below).
Dropping severity _again_. On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > severity 435535 important > thanks > > afaik, iceowl never build on that arch before ... however, this looks > more like buildd breakage than an issue with iceowl. Maybe just try to > respin ... as gcc complains about headers that do exist (as on other > archs)... and that are not arch dependent. > > > - Alexander > > > - Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
