Hi Nico, Can you explain how you consider this a copy? all files are different according to my reading, though only 5-10% changed. And also what you suggest is the best way to fix this problem? e.g. is it best for me to grab the source of ppmd when building (using, say apt-get source) or is there a better way? I would like to avoid duplication if possible but I do not want to lose the work of the modifications that were contributed by somebody else. And this code is fairly complicated so I do not want to break it accidentally... cheers, -r
On Dec 29, 2007 6:05 AM, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guillem, > * Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-29 14:26]: > [...] > > > If it is broken on 64-bit machines then I think I will need to remove > > > it from the build. But that has yet to be demonstrated on this version. > > > I am closing this bug until evidence to that effect comes to me. > > > > Just check the ppmd package. The patches should apply mostly cleanly, > > and there's no significant differences that would fix any 64 bit > > clean issue, there's also unaligned access fixes in the ppmd package > > not present in this one. > > > > The segfaults was one of the reasons I added a build time check for > > the binary, so that it would fail early and not provide broken > > packages. > > I added this to our list of embedded source code copies. > Kind regards and thanks for the heads up. > Nico > -- > Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF > For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. > -- "Our lives are determined by what we pay attention to; the quality of our lives is determined by the quality of our attention." -- Michael Wells -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
