Hello, Joey Hess wrote (03 Jan 2008 01:08:30 GMT) : > According to duplicity's changelog:
> New in v0.4.4.RC4 (2007/10/26) > ------------------------------ > WARNING: COMMAND LINE CHANGES ARE NOT BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE! > There is a new command line syntax to separate actions and > options. Refer to the new man page for full details of the > change. The new syntax looks like: > duplicity [full|incr] [options] source_dir target_url > duplicity [restore] [options] source_url target_dir > duplicity verify [options] source_url target_dir > duplicity collection-status [options] target_url > duplicity list-current-files [options] target_url > duplicity cleanup [options] target_url > duplicity remove-older-than time [options] target_url > So I think it needs to run duplicity once with just the new > remove-older-than subcommand, after (or before?) the main backup. > I hacked backupninja to not pass the --remove-older-than switch, and it > seems to be successfully backing up again. Work is ongoing to make backupninja work with duplicity >= 0.4.4. The current backupninja packages suggests duplicity (<< 0.4.4), but there should actually maybe be a versionned conflict instead. Bye, -- intrigeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | gnupg key @ http://intrigeri.boum.org/intrigeri.asc | We're dreaming of something else. | Something more clandestine, something happier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
