Hi Ondrej, On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: <snip> > > However, soon PyEPL will depend on pyglet and I don't think that a > > package dependency on sympy is the proper way to deal with it. > > > > I'd be glad if we could discuss possible ways to go on from here. > > No, the proper way, of course, is to package pyglet separately. We > include it in sympy > just because we include it in the upstream tarball (so that it's > selfcontained), but > in Debian we should create a separate package for pyglet. I just didn't have > time to do it. > > So if you package pyglet, that'd be awesome. Right, so I'll continue with out packaging and file an ITP next ;-)
> We prepared the sympy upstream tarball in a way, so that it's easy to > just delete > the pyglet in debian/rules and depend on the one in Debian. Cool. > (There are actually some subtle issues, like that we need to have the latest > svn version of pyglet in sympy, due to some bugs in pyglet, that were fixed > recently, but this will settle in time.) Good to know. Thanks for the information. Could you drop me a note when pyglet upstream does a release that works with Debian sympy? But probably this will just be the next one... uscan will notify ;-) Thanks, Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]