Dear Kapil,
My main goal in using tex4ht is to share documents with people who
do not use TeX, or process the documents by other programs. For this
purpose, the problem I have reported on is "important" as it prevents
such use. However, for the sake of publishing a document in html
format, this is of no major concern. Thus, I accept your opinion that
this should be counted in the wish list.
Thank you for the great assistance,
Rani
On 5/5/05, Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Ran Gilad-Bachrach,
>
> Please see the enclosed mail from the author Eitan Gurari.
> He is planning to provide a fix in the next version. For
> the time being I think I will agree with Vassilii that this is
> really "wishlist" rather than "important" (at least as a bug for
> tex4ht---I do think it is up to text viewers/browsers that
> render unicode to do this job as correctly as possible).
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:04:48PM -0400, Eitan Gurari wrote:
> > Unfortunately, too many people complain about this and other similar
> > lack of font support problems by browsers for unicode symbols. I'll
> > try to `fix' the problem the coming weekend. -eitan
>
> Perhaps the fix will take the form of an option for mk4ht/htlatex that
> selects non-unicode glyph substitution.
>
> I hope I have your permission. I am re-tagging this as a wishlist item.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Kapil.
> --
>
>
