On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:38:02PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 11:44 AM, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > since libboost-*1.34.1-2 have always been only in experimental, i'm > > not really sure if such conflic should be deployed. > > Are you sure? > [2007-08-16] Accepted 1.34.1-2 in unstable (low) (Steve M. Robbins)
Yes. However, that upload contained a package named
libboost-date-time1.34.1
not libboost-date-time1.34.1-2
c.f. http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/boost/news/20070816T064711Z.html
The mystery to me is: where did you get the packages named with
suffix "-2" on them. What is the first entry of their changelog
files?
At this point, the easiest way for you to proceed is uninstall
all the boost stuff and reinstall.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
