On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:07:15AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > Package: libical > > Version: 0.27-1 > > Severity: important > > Usertags: implicit-pointer-conversion > > Any reason why this is not severity `serious'? The build apparently > failed and there are no ia64 binaries, which causes FTBFS for other > packages like agenda.app.
The ia64 buildd has a hook that fails builds which fail this test. This hook was introduced by the buildd maintainer when such a bug resulted in chroot corruption. It doesn't mean the package FTBFS on ia64 - just that the ia64 autobuilder is refusing to upload it. In fact, its quite possible that the code path in question is never actually reached in practice - I haven't attempted to show otherwise. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
