Tim Retout wrote:
> Package: dnsmasq
> Version: 2.35-1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> We have nameservers handling separate private subnets, and 'server'
> lines in dnsmasq.conf to forward requests to them, like:
> 
>       server=/2.168.192.in-addr.arpa/192.168.2.1
>       server=/company.lan/192.168.2.1
> 
> However, to get reverse lookups working for this private subnet, I have
> to turn off the 'bogus-priv' option. I expect this means that reverse
> lookups for other private ranges could get forwarded to external DNS
> servers.
> 
> It might be better if the bogus-priv option took account of any 'server'
> in-addr.arpa lines for private subnets, and allowed forwarding in these
> cases.
> 
> There was a similar request on the dnsmasq-discuss mailing list in 2005:
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2005q2/000272.html
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 4.0
>   APT prefers stable
>   APT policy: (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-amd64
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> 
> Versions of packages dnsmasq depends on:
> ii  adduser                3.102             Add and remove users and groups
> ii  libc6                  2.3.6.ds1-13etch4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> ii  libdbus-1-3            1.0.2-1           simple interprocess messaging 
> syst
> ii  netbase                4.29              Basic TCP/IP networking system
> 
> dnsmasq recommends no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> 

It is possible to get the same effect for the unwanted private ranges
like so:

local=/127.in-addr.arpa/
local=/10.in-addr.arpa/
local=/16.172.in-addr.arpa/
local=/17.172.in-addr.arpa/
local=/18.172.in-addr.arpa/
.
.
local=/31.172.in-addr.arpa/
local=/254.169.in-addr.arpa/


A little clumsy, but a reasonable workaround for a fairly rare situation.

Cheers,

Simon.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to