On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:24:44PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Mark Brown]
> > This is blocked by licensing issues - there are some nits with the > > licensing which cause ftpmaster to reject any split packages. I > I am talking about producing two binary packages from the nis source > package. RedHat is already doing this, so it is already done > elsewhere. RedHat are actually doing what I was planning to do which is produce one package for each package upstream releases (there are three). I can't see any reason to keep the merged source package since it's more work to maintain it due to having to munge the upstream tarballs together. > Was the ftpmaster rejecting two new binary packages? I > fail to see why there should be any licensing issues for that. I would expect anything that goes though new to be rejected - the issues apply to the existing package as well but since that doesn't need to be acked by ftpmaster there's no need for them to explicitly say it's OK. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
