On 2008-01-31 01:22 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:48:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > > Note that we don't intend to include arm in lenny+1 and would like to > > have a clear commitment from the arm/armel pointers to switch to only > > armel (no arm anymore) after lenny. > > Armel is already where most of the work is done, and already at > last debconf we agreed that the best way to proceed would be to > release lenny with arm + armel and the drop arm. So, yes, we > can commit to that[1]. If there is still oldabi arm user demand, > we can support them using the debian-ports infrastructure with > relatively little effort.
Yep. That is all good. In line with Debconf consensus, and porter direction, and having arm+armel for one release allows our users some time for transition, so we are not 'pulling rug out' from under them. Hopefully Strongarm/oldabi demand will not continue too long after lenny+1, because oldabi will inevitably degrade slowly... > > IRC discussion with tbm showed that lenny should include both arm and > > armel to give people a chance to switch from a supported arm to a > > supported armel > > This is currently in the hands of ftp-masters, and Anthony Towns has > already agreed to add armel to the archive. Which, I think is totally > awesome :) Indeed. Thanx to all for their efforts on this. Wookey -- Principal hats: Balloonz - Toby Churchill - Aleph One - Debian http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
